Neither the representatives of insurance companies, or representatives of science. Presents a slightly different problem now with the content and scope of the concept of insurance crime. Disagreement as to the definition of the crime of insurance leads to the spread as a result of determining estimates of the number of the fraud, extortion amount of compensation and benefits, as well as fraud on insurance premiums. Often you can meet with the division of insurance fraud on the \"soft\" and \"hard\", where the first term is called the cases of exaggerated claims, when the client attempts to obtain additional benefits in connection with the injury actually taking place, whereas the second term is called fraud cases, where there was no damage at all, or there is no liability insurance. The consensus is that \"hard fraud\" constitutes a criminal offense, but you can meet up with the idea that \"soft fraud\" may be only a manifestation of the difference.
|